|
|
|
Areas of Work
|
|
Mekong Malaria Programme
|
| Background
|
|
The Mekong Malaria Programme, originally
launched in Ho Chi Minh City
in 1999 as the Mekong Roll Back Malaria Initiative, brought together all
national programmes and partners working on
malaria. It both reinvigorated existing strategic projects in the Mekong region as well as initiated new ones. The programme, supported mainly with USAID funds, paid
particular attention to the following technical areas: (1) monitoring
therapeutic efficacy of antimalarial drugs used in
the Mekong region to update national drug policies, (2) monitoring quality,
access and use of malaria and other drugs available in the field, (3)
increasing capacity of national staff to select, plan and monitor malaria
control activities, (4) setting up regular exchange forums and technical
consultations to identify, share and disseminate best practices in malaria
control including cross border activity projects throughout the Great Mekong Subregion (GMS), (5) monitoring Mekong malaria burden
trends, (6) setting up and monitoring the malaria research agenda.
As a result, more partners became actively
engaged in malaria control and were supporting national authorities to
successfully reach their national targets. And since
it started operating in 2002, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and
Malaria, has contributed more than USD 275 million in malaria control in Mekong countries.
Official
epidemiological records communicated by Mekong Member States to the WHO show
that malaria deaths and morbidity cases in 2005 have been reduced by 50% as
compared to 1998. These targets were supposed to be reached by 2010
|
|
|
|
Mekong Malaria Member
Countries:
|
|
Cambodia
Lao PDR
Myanmar
PR China (Yunnan)
Thailand
Vietnam
|
|
Malaria
in the Greater Mekong Sub region: Regional and Country Profiles 
|
|
|
|
Informal consultation on resource mobilization for the containment of artemisinin-tolerant malaria parasites on the
Cambodia-Thailand border, Phnom Penh, Cambodia,
17-18 June 2008
|
|

Together with MMP, WPRO has
organized the informal consultation on resource mobilization
for the containment of artemisinin-tolerant malaria
parasites on the Cambodia-Thailand border in Phnom Penh,
Cambodia from 17 to 18 June, 2008. Representatives from Cambodia
and Thai malaria programmes and donors (e.g. USAID,
BMGF, AUSaid, DFID and Clinton Foundation)
participated in the consultation. DPM from WPRO, Dr Nesbit,
co-chaired the overall session. Purpose was to present and clarify to
potential donors budgeted national / cross-country containment
operations resulting from several consultative meetings in Geneva, Bangkok and Phnom Penh and with national programmes
thanks to several missions and intensive assistance from WHO and
partners. USD 37, 972,981 are requested to cover 18-month operations
to take place in both countries (10 provinces in Cambodia and 7 in Thailand)
from January 2009 till June 2010, on top of existing funding e.g. from GFR6
in Cambodia and GFR7 in Thailand. It is anticipated that GFR9 will cover
longer term operations from July 2010 onwards. Meeting outcomes
reiterated the need to start containment operations as emergency operations
with solid technical and efficient managerial structure across the 2
countries. In light of the magnitude of short term elimination
operations and funding and limited staff capacity at peripheral level, a
feasibility study is urgently needed. The writer facilitated the
finalization of the cross country containment plan and budget with VBDC
Thailand and CNM Cambodia in order to strengthen strategic operations
alignment, impact/outcome indicators and overall multi country budget keeping
in perspective the essential coordination role of MMP with USAID-funded
partners as well. Next action is for WHO to
finalize the LOI to be submitted to the BMGF and to collaborate with both
countries to develop GFR9 proposals to support long-term containment
operations till 2015.
|
|
A training
session from 23-25 May 2008, Shanghai,
China
|
|
|
|

Following recommendations made in Phuket,
Thailand, during an informal consultation to monitor P. falciparum
and P. Vivax resistance to 1st line animalarial drugs in the GMS, a training session from 23
to 25 May 2008 was organized by the National Institute of Parasitology in Shanghai (Director, Prof Tang Ling-hua). The training session was facilitated by D. Bustos (dorinabustos@yahoo.com)
with 12 participants from PR China and therapeutic efficacy study
(TES) focal points from Lao PDR and Viet Nam. Participants became
familiar with the updated WHO protocol to monitor resistance and technical
clarifications were provided upon request.
Members of the Mekong Malaria Technical Advisory Group
on molecular markers, Dr Frederick Ariey from
Institute Pasteur, Cambodia, and Dr Hans Peter-Beck from Swiss Tropical
Institute, Switzerland visited the National Institute of Parasitology during
the same period. The importance of
standardized procedures (SOPs) for molecular assays was explained to
participants, e.g. for blood collection, transport, laboratory
SOPs, quality control procedures and exchange of blood samples.
|
|
USAID Mekong Malaria Programme core
partners' meeting, 28-29 April 2008, Bangkok, Thailand 
|
|
|
|

WHO MMP has co-organized the USAID core partners' meeting
in Bangkok from 28 to 29 April 2008 to review progress made against
USAID-funded activities planned in October 2007. As essential meeting
outcomes were the 2 presentations made by HE Dr Duong Socheat (Director
CNM Cambodia) and Dr Wichai Satimai
(Director VBDC Thailand) summarizing budgeted emergency interventions to be
performed in 2008 to contain artemisnin
tolerant falciparum parasites. Longer-term
detailed containment budget will be produced by the 2 countries to be
submitted to potential donors e.g. the BMGF and USAID to cover the
period from January 2009 to June 2010 and the GFTAM R9 from July 2010
onwards. Participants agreed to increase their technical and financial
contributions with focus on field interventions impacting on drug resistance
along the Cambodia-Thailand border and in the GMS.
|
|
Informal
consultation to draft the strategy to eliminate P. falciparum MDR strains, 13-14 February 2008, Bangkok, Thailand 
|
|
|
|

Programme managers, implementers, researchers and donors agree on
strategic interventions to be immediately supported by all partners in
Cambodian and Thai provinces where tolerant artemisinin
malaria parasites have been documented (Bangkok, 13-14 February 2008).
|
|
Monitoring Resistance of P.
FALCIPARUM and P. VIVAX to Anti-Malarial Drugs in the Greater
Mekong Sub-Region, Report of an Informal Consultation, Phuket, Thailand, 3-5 September 2007 
|
|
|
|

Programme
Managers and scientists from Mekong countries alongside with partners and
donors agreed during
a WHO
informal consultation in Phuket,
Thailand to use standardized
WHO
protocols to conduct in vivo therapeutic efficacy studies in selected
sentinel sites in 2008 and 2009
(Phuket, Thailand, 3-5 September 2007)
|
|
|
|

In a
remote village of Tachileik township in Myanmar,
discussion takes place with local authorities and village malaria volunteers
who are using rapid tests to diagnose malaria and to
provide powerful artemisinin-based combination
treatment.
|
|

Across
Mekong countries (a remote village of Cambodia shown here), bed nets are
widely used by people living in malaria endemic areas.
Such
conventional nets, when impregnated with insecticide at least once a year,
are becoming powerful tools against infected
mosquito bites.
|
|

Many
kinds of drugs of variable quality are available in local shops in Mekong
countries including antimalarials and monotherapies
which contribute to increased parasite resistance to artemisinin derivatives.
|
|
Vision
|
|
The Mekong Malaria Programme (MMP) overarching
contribution, alongside Government and Non-Government Partners, is to improve
the health status of the Mekong population with special focus on malaria
control and attention to the most vulnerable population in the Mekong
region.
|
|
Goal
|
|
The Mekong Malaria Programme aims to facilitate the implementation and
monitoring of a comprehensive Mekong Malaria Control Strategy endorsed
by national authorities and stakeholders to address the remaining common
challenges in order to make further impact on malaria mortality and morbidity
in the subregion.
|
|
Objectives
|
|
The
objectives of the Mekong Malaria Programme which are aligned with the Roll
Back Malaria Partnership initiative and technically supported by the WHO
southeast and western pacific regions and the Global Malaria Programme are as
follows:
to further reduce malaria mortality by at least 50% by 2010 as
compared to 2005;
to further reduce the disease burden of malaria (incidence)
preferentially in the population where malaria is a major health problem by
at least 50% by 2010 as compared to 2005;
to contain the development of multi-drug
resistance falciparum parasites.
|
|
Strategies
|
|
1. Early diagnosis and prompt
effective treatment of cases. It includes the large use of recommended artemisinin-based combination treatments (ACTs) for fully curing falciparum
malaria infections. This is in a context where P. falciparum,
the deadliest form of malarial infection, is becoming more resistant to
current ACTs. P. vivax,
the most frequent type of infections, are also
highly prevalent in the region and attention has to be paid to monitor vivax resistance to chloroquine,
the treatment drug. Urgent measures to address factors which may increase falciparum resistance to ACTs
also have to be implemented.
2. Prevention by adjusting
control measures to transmission settings, malaria vectors and population
characteristics, bearing in mind that high coverage is a prerequisite for
having an impact on morbidity and mortality.
3. Strengthening the
surveillance system to efficiently gather epidemiological data, including those
from remote locations, and mapping the population at risk. The surveillance
system should be able to detect and control epidemics in a timely manner.
4. Empowering the hard-to-reach
population in remote areas to understand the disease through appropriate communications,
protect themselves and access any health care services that may be available
there.
5. Increasing the coverage of
quality peripheral health services, including encouragement of successful
public-private mix initiatives, in such a way that population at risk easily
access health information, early quality diagnosis and prompt treatment.
6. Improve programme
management to ensure it is operational at the district level.
|
|
For more information
|
|
|
|
|